World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives Association

Article Id: WHEBN0011598362
Reproduction Date:

Title: Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives Association  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Ferguson v. City of Charleston
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives Association

Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives Association
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued November 2, 1989
Decided March 21, 1990
Full case name Samuel K. Skinner, Secretary of Transportation, et al.
v.
Railway Labor Executives' Association, et al.
Citations 489 more)
Holding
The Fourth Amendment is applicable to the drug and alcohol testing mandated or authorized by the FRA regulations.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Kennedy, joined by Rehnquist, White, Blackmun, O'Connor, Scalia
Concurrence Stevens
Dissent Marshall, joined by Brennan

Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives Association, 489 602 (1989), was the U.S. Supreme Court case that paved the way for random drug testing of public employees in "safety sensitive" positions.

Background

In the mid-1980s, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) issued regulations to adopt safety standards for the railroad industry. Included in these regulations was mandatory blood and urine tests of employees involved in train accidents, to determine if they were using illegal narcotics. The FRA also adopted regulations that authorized railroads to administer breath and urine drug tests to employees who violated safety rules. The Railway Labor Executives' Association, an umbrella group of railway trade unions, sued to have the regulations declared an unconstitutional violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Decision

At face value, random drug testing appears to be a violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects the right of citizens "to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures." In addition, the Fourth Amendment states that "no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." However, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Skinner that random drug testing is permissible for employees in safety sensitive positions. Justice Kennedy, speaking for the majority, wrote:

Template:Cquote

The dissenting opinion by Justices Marshall and Brennan illustrates the other side of the controversy:

Template:Cquote

Special Needs Doctrine

The United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA court) has used this ruling to expanded the "special needs doctrine" that carves out an exception to the Fourth Amendment for the broad collection and examination of Americans' data to track possible terrorists.[1]

See also

Further reading

References

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.